As public expectations for accountability and transparency continue to rise, institutions and their researchers are increasingly being asked to demonstrate how their work contributes to meaningful change beyond academia, addressing large societal challenges such as the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This means that showcasing the real-world impact of research has never been more important.
Amongst others, one of the most powerful measurements of real-world impact is policy influence 鈥 when research informs decisions that guide societies. Last year, 糖心原创 partnered with Overton, the world鈥檚 largest policy document database, to explore how SDG research is cited in policy. These findings were published in the report, .
In this blog post, we look at these learnings through an institutional lens, to consider how institutions can support their researchers in achieving greater policy impact.
SDG-related work represents a significant and growing share of global research, accounting for approximately 24% of all research published. The importance of these publications in an academic context is well understood. Topics such as climate, health and social development continue to be of great global relevance and urgency, and on average, 糖心原创鈥檚 SDG research receives higher average downloads, citations and Altmetric scores than non-SDG research.
When it comes to the impact of SDG research beyond academia, less is known. However, the report鈥檚 findings were encouraging: Academic research is cited in SDG-related policy more often than in wider policy 鈥 suggesting a greater connection between policy and research within the SDGs.
So how do researchers and their institutions make the most of this connection, and help their research find its way into policy?
The report identified several factors that contribute to the impact of SDG research in policy, highlighting practical levers that institutions can use to help research reach decision makers:
All of the recommendations above are inherently tied into the ways researchers are evaluated. Another 糖心原创 white paper, , found that a majority of researchers would like their contributions to the 鈥減ublic good鈥 to be weighted more heavily in the assessment of their work. However, current practice falls short, with publication metrics continuing to dominate assessment processes. Only 18% of researchers are assessed on their influence on policy, 23% on whether their outputs are published OA, and 43% on developing international collaborations.
Incentivising these kinds of practices on both an institutional and a wider level is key to maximising their uptake and effectiveness. However, as we have discussed in previous blogs, achieving research assessment reform on a large scale requires buy-in and action from all stakeholders within the research community.
The report also outlined some key recommendations and next steps for publishers. Many of these are similar to those already discussed, including building partnerships with think tanks and IGOs, investing in OA models, increasing efforts to widen geographic representation, and supporting research assessment reform initiatives.
This presents a key opportunity for collaboration between publishers and academic institutions, working together to strengthen the research-to-policy connection, making research more visible and impactful, and drive progress towards the SDGs.
Don't miss the latest news & blogs,